Celebrating Protest

April 5, 2007

pleasure, play, and an impressive Tit

Filed under: Tari Ito & MASA — kate @ 1:53 am

I saw the “Dear Tari” documentary last year at the Gender Studies workshop, and I’ve remembered it vividly since– I was really excited to see Tari perform in person, because I find her performances incredibly moving. Given the emotional resonances I find in Tari’s work, I– like others, I think– was surprised when she said that she tries to keep emotion out of her performance (although she did say that she felt emotional last night), and the performance we saw last night, at least, is just about her interaction with an object. So maybe pleasure doesn’t seem like an “emotion,” in the same way that anger or frustration, whichTari feels toward a heteronormative society, does. Because pleasure seems exactly what last night’s performance was about– pleasure in one’s own body and it’s acoustical capacities, pleasure in moving, and orienting toward an object in a sensual, playful manner– pleasure in sharing that orientation with an audience… Tari’s face is extraordinarily expressive, particularly when seen WAY up close on a screen!, and her performance seems like a window into the most private recessess of pleasure and play. Her talent as a performer is illustrated in the ways that she makes this privateness a gift to her audience, who she brought into the performance in an extremely generous way. (Because didn’t you want to touch the Tit, yourself?)

On an unrelated note: one of the audience members mentioned in the Q&A that the Tit seemed phallic. I’ve been contemplating this comment– which could refer to the Tit as seeming “phallic” in terms of “like a penis” or even in terms of giving pleasure– but it could also refer to something about the imposing size of the Tit (which really does need to be capitalized!). So it’s actually amusing to me to think that “phallic” means, in a publically available heteronormative and male centric sort of way, “impressive.” Ha! I don’t think that’s what Tari had in mind, needless to say. But the comment did express the power, or something, of this sort of discourse. (Anyway, I’m trying to avoid seeming like I’m criticizing this woman for making that comment– because I’m pretty sure she wished she hadn’t said it, as soon as she had.)

What do you all think?

2 Comments »

  1. What an interesting comment on the Tit as phallic. From the
    back of the room where I stood, the tit looked like a playful creature floating around everyone’s head, mediating Tari san and the audience. And arms and bodies chasing and reaching the tit looked as though they were also actors in the performance.
    But for someone who experienced the tit looming and moving over her/his head and randomly crossing the performer/audience boundary back and forth, it might have felt very different. It could be the case that the magnified presence of the tit from very very close could even be intimidating or dominating for someone.

    Comment by tseto — April 5, 2007 @ 4:01 pm | Reply

  2. Nice site. very good information. I really like it, keepthe good job. You can also visit my site at <ahref=\\\\

    Comment by Free best information on ringtonegratis — August 26, 2007 @ 10:48 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.