I guess the article didn’t come out, but I wonder if what you’re referring to isn’t the ad that was published by Japanese lawmakers in the WaPo some days ago, which lists “facts” about the “alleged ‘comfort women’” situation. A link to another blog talking about this is here:
Thanks naesung for pointing out the mistake. The article I’m referring to is exactly the one you’re talking about. I edited my entry so that the article is linked properly. I hope this time it works.
I guess the article didn’t come out, but I wonder if what you’re referring to isn’t the ad that was published by Japanese lawmakers in the WaPo some days ago, which lists “facts” about the “alleged ‘comfort women’” situation. A link to another blog talking about this is here:
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/06/18/more-on-the-comfort-women-ad/
Comment by naesung — June 19, 2007 @ 9:26 pm |
Thanks naesung for pointing out the mistake. The article I’m referring to is exactly the one you’re talking about. I edited my entry so that the article is linked properly. I hope this time it works.
Comment by tosh — June 20, 2007 @ 11:39 am |
Add this to the list of official historical revisionism:
http://iht.com/articles/2007/06/19/asia/nanking.1-78430.php
Comment by naesung — June 21, 2007 @ 4:01 am |